March 30, 2017 at 11:05 am

Earlier unless a blog was approved we could not post the next one.  Now since we can post more and they get rejected after one applies for redemption that is not good for the blogger.  A blogger takes a lot of time over their blogs and rejecting them can be devastating.

I appeal to @support to look into this. I am told some bloggers blogs have been rejected with hardly any money left in their balance. @support should read the blog and then and there either accept or reject but not just accept only to be rejected later.  This way bloggers will not stay here.

March 30, 2017 at 11:57 am

I agree.

If support does not feel our blog posts are worth it. They should reject it immediately not wait until one reaches payout.

Then to redeem and get deducted a huge lost. Imagine all the time they have spent?

March 30, 2017 at 12:29 pm

I agree. Knowing the problems in the post can tell you where to improve. And if the topic and writing on that is worth it or not. I have found that some of the time people will continue to write and they get to realize that their payout is deducted or rejected completely. And then they think why this has happened to them. Let’s see how things goes. Hope support answers. I am hoping that we reach to conclusion that helps the writers stay. Otherwise it’d be kind of difficult to manage that part for sure.

March 30, 2017 at 3:24 pm

There are few things the blogger already knows are violations

1. Less than 300 words

2. short titles

3. plagiarised text and images.

And as for quality that lies with the site and they should pointit out before placing the blogs in the dashboard.

1

March 30, 2017 at 5:51 pm

What the site wants us to blog are quality blogs.But those not quality in content better not approved to avoid dismal feeling during redemption. Though I have not experienced this in fact , my salry was doubled, but my friend a blogger here has earning deducted so big deduction that almost have nothing for him. I keep on advising him, I pity him by the way for he is so serious in his writing and very much knowledgeable as to what to write.

I hope that rejection be done before redemption comes and rejection follows. It should be rejection first to improve the writing before re – posting. .Thanks.

March 30, 2017 at 7:04 pm

The problem is that if you write any factual piece, it is likely that it will be discarded for’plagiarism’  because somewhere in the world someone wrote “Donald Trump was elected President” .  This allows the Admin to play with plagairism so as to prevent you from cashing out.

March 31, 2017 at 1:22 am

I can see that there are many speculation around and people are believing what has been heard from unreliable source.

First, Our moderators are regularly managing content for quality and avoid any kind of plagiarized content, since there is no hold on blogs so people are free to blog and we have to maintain the quality at the same time and blogs got rejected on a daily bases. On the other end we have content report system is intake when we find to many content report from the particular author then we have to hold this author and hir/her subsequent payment until and unless their all articles will be re-evaluated and approved explicitly. This is both necessary and important because if we don’t do this then any spammy author will hurt literacybase ranking in search engine and steal your money which belongs to our dedicated writers.

So, to prevent this we have this schedule check for some reported users not all. There are many things we can’t prevent from front end programming to submit. so we have to go manual process to maintain the quality and balance. As long as you people are posting quality content then you have nothing to worry about. Only people who are trying to trick the system will caught up in the process.

As far as plagiarism is concerned, there are many ways to ditch plagiarism which causes us to find it hard. But we are trying our best to detect. As far as super news concerns there are always unique content will be created if you create on your own, however you can take some part and direct quotation since this can’t be change but this must be a small part of your article like 10 to 20 percentage.

P.S: How many of you have experience this thing? Just let us know. I am sure we have right answer for this.

March 31, 2017 at 1:44 am

Thank you very much @support for this clarification. And thank you for removing the spammy blogs that appeared here a few days ago.

Concerning “plagiarism” for some facts used in the articles, I have not yet experienced it since I am a newbie and had my first redemption was last March 29. I still have to see if it affected me. So far, I wish it would not because I always give attribution to my sources.

We are glad you are very “visible” here to clear some doubts.

March 31, 2017 at 3:15 am

@support

Good to see you reply and clarify many issues at one time. Thank you for the same. But I had written an article here in this group with the heading ‘why is the amount reducing’? and have also posted all the details about the post for which payment was made for 35 cents and then my article was thrashed the next day and payment reversed.

I have also requested you to let me know the reason why the post got thrashed because I have written the article on my own it was quite long and took one and half hour to finish the blog. The same got accepted and then thrashed. I also sent the details in the contact us on the top right side too. But till date I have not heard any thing about this issue. Request you to kindly let me know about the same as if I come to know if some genuine error as per you was committed or whatever the reason then I can correct myself. That was the only article which met that sorry fate. And it was on a important topic.

If you do not want to publish and still have the article kindly send it to my email mentioned in the contact us. It is more than a week and I am still expecting reply. Please do the needful. Best wishes and regards.

March 31, 2017 at 5:37 am

I prefer to write factual pieces and take information from various sources.  There is no way it can change.  If I am writing about any issue I want to be able to prove I am telling the truth.

Since my ‘slap down’ I am going to avoid factual pieces because there is really no way to post any thing factual or current without ‘copying’.    “Thirty five people were blown up at X place.”  I can’t change that.   “It is believed that Daash sent a female suicide bomber to…”   I can’t touch that.  What should I post then?  Some people were smeared all over the landscape because some kind of bomb was set by some guy from that terrorist organisation?”

March 31, 2017 at 8:47 am

@support I fully appreciate your vigilance but my only request is that it is done before our blogs come to the dashboard.  Earlier you did that but you took too long for approval.  If you can approve our blogs say within 3 days then we could write further posts – earlier the better.

I have not been posting of late and I have no personal issues per se, but merely want to emphasise the need to approve our blogs before they come to the dashboard.  Even updating our bank and then deducting could be quite demoralising.

Thank you for your prompt response.

March 31, 2017 at 8:49 am

@support Also, what about sharing posts once they come to the dashboard and then they are rejected?

March 31, 2017 at 11:22 am

@support  There is yet another issue.  When blogs appear in the blogs section users comment on them and earn something.  What will happen to those earning if the blogs are rejected at the time of redemption ?

March 31, 2017 at 8:45 pm

@krishnakumarks – Please Inbox Me Here at literacybase with your article title that has been trashed, I will look into this.

@bestwriter – People who gets points by commenting on spammy blogs. Once blog removed so do their comments and points will automatically be deducted. All users are part of this community we all have to save this community from spam. So, Instead of commenting on spammy blog users make sure to report this blog. So both user and the website will be saved.

As long as sharing blogs is concerned, So no worries about it. Your shared blogs and earning from the visitor will not be reversed once blog got removed.

@kaylar – Lets take a live example of covering latest news. You can see that you can’t change that fact since there are many news channels and websites around they all are covering the same news at the same time. But each news website article is unique in smartest way. However the news is same like “Thirty five people were blown up at X place” but you will see the title is not exactly the same for all news websites. Every news website is covering the news in their own unique perspective.

Let me give you an example:
So, This is the current news

“Trump says trade gap will make China meeting ‘a very difficult one'”

This news has been covered by many news websites with their own unique angle of news broadcasting. such as:

Trump sets himself on collision course with China ahead of Xi meeting

The Guardian

US trade barriers report slams China

gulfnews.com

Trump hypes next week’s meeting with Xi Jinping on Twitter, predicts it will be ‘very difficult’

Shanghaiist

Commentary: Xi-Trump meeting to set tone for China-US ties

Xinhua

Trump, Chinese leader to hold “very difficult” meeting

CBS News

President Trump Predicts ‘Very Difficult’ Meeting With Chinese Leader Xi Jinping

Fortune

Trump’s Meeting With China Is Difficult Because The Donald Is Wrong About Trade, Deficits And Jobs

Forbes

Read these articles, they are all covering the same news but everyone has their own content which is different from each other. If you run plagiarism test on these and several others you will not find enough plagiarism except some fact which cant be change and those are acceptable like 20% content is the same which is dependent on the fact while 70% content has some perspective and journalism.

Hope this will explain this concept.

Thanks – Support

March 31, 2017 at 9:41 pm

@support

Thanks for replying with a clarification and requesting me to send the article title heading which has been accepted and then thrashed. Kindly look into to same and do the needful. Appreciate your response and clarification. Best wishes and regards.

• This reply was modified 7 years, 7 months ago by  Krishna Kumar.